[From nobody Sun Nov  8 13:31:15 2026
Message-ID: &lt;1430809579.5006.11.camel@user-laptop.fritz.box&gt;
Subject: Re: Attachments new ABCD 1.4 beta
From: Renate Morgenstern &lt;rmorgenstern@iway.na&gt;
Reply-To: rmorgenstern@iway.na
To: Guilda Ascencio &lt;guildaa@gmail.com&gt;
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 08:06:19 +0100
In-Reply-To: &lt;CAPspBaRjv45q4BAd8YMzeScWDDe9CWXpEvNb020=JZF=rNbgRg@mail.gmail.com&gt;
References: &lt;CAPspBaQuCbMzvugK=Lh3AspoiRLVcfNoNrqDty7fFa2Nn1-9eA@mail.gmail.com&gt;
 &lt;CAHCQBV1ux+u+WhdO9OFFK_KiHTusN0CGRMcW2Hyqi1Cg3jZEqg@mail.gmail.com&gt;
 &lt;CAPspBaRusz1a=BY4RYuktEQpuOgv4_xaGt=tRxFn8dpvnJE9uQ@mail.gmail.com&gt;
 &lt;7A31013ECEFE9A47B6A502B4A259260B015677C992@xmail31.ad.ua.ac.be&gt;
 &lt;7D1127CD0357433EB9B2496A3AEFE389@MAMERCEDES&gt;
 &lt;CAPspBaR--Pot1cVq8xH5qd64EqswkWs0fDni8KZsiLYU7eWWGQ@mail.gmail.com&gt;
 &lt;1430752066.15190.8.camel@user-laptop.fritz.box&gt;
 &lt;CAPspBaQwh7-e37MRBObOJgCw5ZtZ+2eM7EhODr49cxXTGR7zEQ@mail.gmail.com&gt;
 &lt;1430772968.22863.9.camel@user-laptop.fritz.box&gt;
 &lt;CAPspBaRjv45q4BAd8YMzeScWDDe9CWXpEvNb020=JZF=rNbgRg@mail.gmail.com&gt;
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=&quot;=-DOJ2EGfB5KLI4UOWCTLS&quot;
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 
Mime-Version: 1.0


--=-DOJ2EGfB5KLI4UOWCTLS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&quot;UTF-8&quot;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,
no, sometimes ^b is absent. I changed the FST and made it conditional:
if a(v600^b) then |BI_|v600^a|%| else |BI_|v600^a,|, |v600^b|%|/ fi)
It is alphabetical now, but some have the comma between ^a and ^b, some
not.
Why is is that the search does not has this problem, only when using it
as authority in data entry?
Thanks 
Renate


&gt; if v600^b always present?  The % is conditioned to the presence of ^b
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Renate Morgenstern
&gt; &lt;rmorgenstern@iway.na&gt; wrote:
&gt; 
&gt;         Hi,
&gt;         
&gt;         No, the data is ok. When I click on it to copy it to the
&gt;         field, there are no spaces or other characters before or after
&gt;         the subfields.
&gt;         
&gt;         
&gt;         &gt; This is a problem with the fst and with the data.
&gt;         &gt; 
&gt;         &gt; 
&gt;         &gt; 1) if a field starts with a space or with an non-alphabetic
&gt;         &gt; character it will be shown at the beginning of the list
&gt;         &gt; 
&gt;         
&gt;         I am not indexing a subfield, but all the fields in the field,
&gt;         e.g. 
&gt;         
&gt;         1 0 (|BI_|v600^a,|, |v600^b|%|/)
&gt;         
&gt;         and still the order is not fully alphabetical.
&gt;         In the autoridades file:
&gt;         case 600: v600^a,|, |v600^b'$$$'mpl,v600
&gt;         
&gt;         in the .def file: DB  BI_ @author.pft
&gt;         
&gt;         Is  something wrong with the above?
&gt;         
&gt;         Thanks
&gt;         Renate
&gt;         
&gt;         
&gt;         
&gt;         &gt; 2) if you are indexing subfields to be used as authority
&gt;         &gt; list you must use different prefixes as well as differents
&gt;         &gt; id's in the fst for the exact identification in the
&gt;         &gt; authority format. It means that each subfield have to be
&gt;         &gt; indexed in separated lines and don't forget to add the '%'
&gt;         &gt; at the end of the format
&gt;         &gt; 
&gt;         &gt; 
&gt;         &gt; On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Renate Morgenstern
&gt;         &gt; &lt;rmorgenstern@iway.na&gt; wrote:
&gt;         &gt; 
&gt;         &gt;         Hi,
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         &gt;         I have tested those areas which gave problems
&gt;         &gt;         before:
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         &gt;         Data entry with lookup table
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         &gt;         When using the lookup table during data entry,
&gt;         &gt;         fields which do not have subfields now work ok, but
&gt;         &gt;         when the field has subfields, the list is not
&gt;         &gt;         displayed in alphabetical order.  I have indexed
&gt;         &gt;         these fields with a different prefix, but the
&gt;         &gt;         problem persists. see screen dump.
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         &gt;         Circulation: From Borrower statement the 'return'
&gt;         &gt;         button now works, but not the renew.
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         &gt;         Will do more testing.
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         &gt;         Renate
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         &gt;         
&gt;         
&gt;         
&gt;         

-- 

Renate Morgenstern
Tel.: +264 61 242124
Cell: +264 81 2910284
Fax: 088637518
Windhoek, Namibia

--=-DOJ2EGfB5KLI4UOWCTLS
Content-Type: text/html; charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

&lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN&quot;&gt;
&lt;HTML&gt;
&lt;HEAD&gt;
  &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Content-Type&quot; CONTENT=&quot;text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8&quot;&gt;
  &lt;META NAME=&quot;GENERATOR&quot; CONTENT=&quot;GtkHTML/4.2.2&quot;&gt;
&lt;/HEAD&gt;
&lt;BODY&gt;
Hi,&lt;BR&gt;
no, sometimes ^b is absent. I changed the FST and made it conditional:&lt;BR&gt;
if a(v600^b) then |BI_|v600^a|%| else |BI_|v600^a,|, |v600^b|%|/ fi)&lt;BR&gt;
It is alphabetical now, but some have the comma between ^a and ^b, some not.&lt;BR&gt;
Why is is that the search does not has this problem, only when using it as authority in data entry?&lt;BR&gt;
Thanks &lt;BR&gt;
Renate&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE&gt;
    if v600^b always present?&nbsp; The % is conditioned to the presence of ^b&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE&gt;
    On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Renate Morgenstern &lt;&lt;A HREF=&quot;mailto:rmorgenstern@iway.na&quot;&gt;rmorgenstern@iway.na&lt;/A&gt;&gt; wrote:
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE&gt;
    &lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
        Hi,&lt;BR&gt;
        &lt;BR&gt;
        No, the data is ok. When I click on it to copy it to the field, there are no spaces or other characters before or after the subfields.&lt;BR&gt;
        &lt;BR&gt;
        &lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE&gt;
            This is a problem with the fst and with the data.&lt;BR&gt;
            &lt;BR&gt;
            &lt;BR&gt;
            1) if a field starts with a space or with an non-alphabetic character it will be shown at the beginning of the list&lt;BR&gt;
            &lt;BR&gt;
        &lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
        I am not indexing a subfield, but all the fields in the field, e.g. &lt;BR&gt;
        &lt;BR&gt;
        1 0 (|BI_|v600^a,|, |v600^b|%|/)&lt;BR&gt;
        &lt;BR&gt;
        and still the order is not fully alphabetical.&lt;BR&gt;
        In the autoridades file:&lt;BR&gt;
        case 600: v600^a,|, |v600^b'$$$'mpl,v600&lt;BR&gt;
        &lt;BR&gt;
        in the .def file: DB&nbsp; BI_ @author.pft&lt;BR&gt;
        &lt;BR&gt;
        Is&nbsp; something wrong with the above?&lt;BR&gt;
        &lt;BR&gt;
        Thanks&lt;BR&gt;
        Renate&lt;BR&gt;
        &lt;BR&gt;
        &lt;BR&gt;
        &lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE&gt;
            2) if you are indexing subfields to be used as authority list you must use different prefixes as well as differents id's in the fst for the exact identification in the authority format. It means that each subfield have to be indexed in separated lines and don't forget to add the '%' at the end of the format&lt;BR&gt;
            &lt;BR&gt;
            &lt;BR&gt;
            On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Renate Morgenstern &lt;&lt;A HREF=&quot;mailto:rmorgenstern@iway.na&quot;&gt;rmorgenstern@iway.na&lt;/A&gt;&gt; wrote:&lt;BR&gt;
            &lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
                Hi,&lt;BR&gt;
                &lt;BR&gt;
                I have tested those areas which gave problems before:&lt;BR&gt;
                &lt;BR&gt;
                Data entry with lookup table&lt;BR&gt;
                &lt;BR&gt;
                When using the lookup table during data entry, fields which do not have subfields now work ok, but when the field has subfields, the list is not displayed in alphabetical order.&nbsp; I have indexed these fields with a different prefix, but the problem persists. see screen dump.&lt;BR&gt;
                &lt;BR&gt;
                Circulation: From Borrower statement the 'return' button now works, but not the renew.&lt;BR&gt;
                &lt;BR&gt;
                Will do more testing.&lt;BR&gt;
                &lt;BR&gt;
                &lt;FONT COLOR=&quot;#888888&quot;&gt;Renate&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
                &lt;BR&gt;
                &lt;BR&gt;
                &lt;BR&gt;
                &lt;BR&gt;
                &lt;BR&gt;
                &lt;BR&gt;
                &lt;BR&gt;
                &lt;TABLE CELLSPACING=&quot;0&quot; CELLPADDING=&quot;0&quot; WIDTH=&quot;100%&quot;&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
            &lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
        &lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
        &lt;TABLE CELLSPACING=&quot;0&quot; CELLPADDING=&quot;0&quot; WIDTH=&quot;100%&quot;&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
    &lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;TABLE CELLSPACING=&quot;0&quot; CELLPADDING=&quot;0&quot; WIDTH=&quot;100%&quot;&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
-- &lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
Renate Morgenstern&lt;BR&gt;
Tel.: +264 61 242124&lt;BR&gt;
Cell: +264 81 2910284&lt;BR&gt;
Fax: 088637518&lt;BR&gt;
Windhoek, Namibia
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;/BODY&gt;
&lt;/HTML&gt;

--=-DOJ2EGfB5KLI4UOWCTLS--
]